Tate v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
137 S.W.3d 404 (2003)
Adam TATE
v.
STATE of Arkansas.
No. CA CR 03-193.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, II.
December 10, 2003.
The Cannon Law Firm, P.L.C., by: David R. Cannon, Little Rock, for appellant.
Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Brent P. Gasper, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
WENDELL L. GRIFFEN, Judge.
This case arises from the criminal conviction of appellant, Adam Tate, for manufacturing a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture, and possession of drug paraphernalia.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.