Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 2003No. CA CR 03-193Published

1Opinion of the Court

137 S.W.3d 404 (2003)

Adam TATE

v.

STATE of Arkansas.

No. CA CR 03-193.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, II.

December 10, 2003.

The Cannon Law Firm, P.L.C., by: David R. Cannon, Little Rock, for appellant.

Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Brent P. Gasper, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

WENDELL L. GRIFFEN, Judge.

This case arises from the criminal conviction of appellant, Adam Tate, for manufacturing a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to manufacture, and possession of drug paraphernalia.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Nichols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API