Legal Opinion
People v. Glass
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*775We find unpersuasive the defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove his guilt of the various offenses with which he was charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the direct and circumstantial evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
Similarly unavailing is the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. CahillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LinderberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. StreeterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. ValdezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.