Legal Opinion
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Rawlings
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 13, 1933No. 6679PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Under circumstances differing in detail, but not in substance and effect, from those in Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Pottorff (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 1, the Planters’ National Bank, in order to secure the continuance with it of the Illinois Central Railroad Company as a general depositor, pledged with that company certain securities. At this time, December, 1928, the bank was not in difficulties. The pledge agreement provided that the hank might withdraw the securities at any time by substituting a surety bond satisfactory to the company, or by paying to it the full amount of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Easton v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Citizens' Central Nat. Bank of NY v. AppletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Brennan v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leonard v. GageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Baldwin v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Aetna Life & Casualty Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Smith v. ZemurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.