Legal Opinion
Mutual Life Ins. v. Schenkat
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 19, 1932No. 4752PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff (appellee here) brought this suit to recover on a double indemnity policy on the life of Otto Schenkat. The portion of the policy in so far as it is important here is printed as it appears in the policy:
“THE
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
WILL PAY.......................................... Dollars to the payee of the face amount of Life Insurance Policy No................ in connection with which this Double Indemnity Policy is issued, upon receipt of due proof that the death of the Insured under said Life Insurance Policy resulted from bodily injury…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horsfall v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Menneiley v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lundberg v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. . OwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1810
- Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Warbende v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Huss v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1941
- Order of United Commercial Travelers v. SevierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.