Legal Opinion

Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. v. Powell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1935No. 3738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by an insurance company from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action on the double indemnity feature of a life insurance policy. In the view which we take of the case, the only assignment of error which we need consider is that based on defendant’s prayer for a directed verdict, and this resolves itself into a question as to the coverage of the double indemnity provisions of the policy and the proof required thereunder. Those provisions of the policy are as follows:

“Section 7. Double death benefit.
“Upon receipt, at its head office, of this policy…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Brams v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Clements v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  2. Warbende v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  3. Kaplan v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1964
  4. Sanderson v. Postal Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  5. Patterson v. Woodmen of World Life Insurance SocietyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API