Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Beck

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 2017No. DA 16-0629PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 James C. Quigley and Linda M.S. Quigley (Quigley) and Richard L. Beck assert conflicting claims of ownership over four water rights for irrigation from Nevada Creek. After presiding over a trial and conducting a site inspection, the Water Master issued a report dividing the four rights between Quigley and Beck based on a ratio of the irrigated acres owned by each party. Quigley filed objections with the Water Court. The Water Court largely adopted the Water Master’s report. Quigley appeals the Water Court’s order. We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Whether the Water…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Skelton Ranch, Inc. v. Pondera County Canal & Reservoir Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2014
  3. MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Harland v. Anderson Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Heavirland v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meine v. Hren RanchesMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  2. VanBuskirk v. GehlenMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Parrot Ditch v. AshcraftMontana Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API