Legal Opinion
Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 18, 1952No. Civ. No. 274-51PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
Defendant earlier moved to dismiss the complaint in the above entitled cause on presentation of matters outside the pleadings and for summary judgment, F.R.C.P. 12(b) (6), 56, 28 U.S.C. On this motion plaintiff attempted to rely on a point not pleaded and the Court, of its own motion, but on terms, as justice required, authorized such amendment to the pleadings F.R.C.P. 15(a). The first question is whether plaintiff has complied with such terms, the second is on the motion for summary judgment.
The complaint is filed for recovery under the Contract Settlement Act of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Metals Disintegrating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Martin Dennis Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Haberle v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Artman v. International Harvester CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Artman v. International Harvester CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952