Legal Opinion

Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 19, 1952No. 10832_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

" This case involves the application of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944. 1 The plaintiff, Glade Mountain Corporation, hereafter called Glade, appeals from the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and claims that a substantial issue of fact was presented.

Glade sued the Reconstruction Finance Corporation after having exhausted its administrative remedy as required by Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. R.F.C., 9 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 854. The contract sued on was made with Metals Reserve Company (MRC) predecessor of RFC. The contract was dated July 26,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. United States ex rel. Taylor v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1930
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  4. Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  5. Haberle v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Belvidere Distilling Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API