Legal Opinion
Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 19, 1952No. 10832_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
" This case involves the application of the Contract Settlement Act of 1944. 1 The plaintiff, Glade Mountain Corporation, hereafter called Glade, appeals from the granting of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and claims that a substantial issue of fact was presented.
Glade sued the Reconstruction Finance Corporation after having exhausted its administrative remedy as required by Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. R.F.C., 9 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 854. The contract sued on was made with Metals Reserve Company (MRC) predecessor of RFC. The contract was dated July 26,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States ex rel. Taylor v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1930
- Southern Pacific Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Glade Mountain Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
- Haberle v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Belvidere Distilling Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954