Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Burmeister

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1929No. 27,143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff at the close of all the testimony moved for a verdict in his favor for $4,000. The motion was denied and the issue submitted to the jury. The jury disagreed and was discharged. Plaintiff then moved for judgment notwithstanding the disagreement, as authorized by G. S. 1923, § 9495. The motion was denied, and plaintiff appeals from the order. Defendant moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it is a nonappealable order.

That § 9495 permits the court below to entertain a motion for judgment in case of a disagreement as well as in a case where a verdict adverse to the mover had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lamberton v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  2. McClearn v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Storey v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Bernat v. Handy Boat Service, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  3. Bolstad v. Paul Bunyan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Gold v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Johnston v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API