Commonwealth v. Shaffer
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*455 OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allowance of appeal in this matter to determine whether the Superior Court erred in holding that the legislature’s amendment of the Pennsylvania Corrupt Organizations Act (Pa.C.O.A.), 18 Pa.C.S. § 911 et seq., to include wholly illegitimate enterprises, applied to criminal activity that occurred under the Act in effect prior to the amendment, which this Court interpreted as applying solely to legitimate enterprises in Commonwealth v. Besch, 544 Pa. 1, 674 A.2d 655 (1996). For the reasons that follow, we find that the Superior Court erred. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SutleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. BeschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. RandolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Greenough v. GreenoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Lucchino v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. Doughty, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. VukmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Lynn, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.