Legal Opinion

Beneficial Consumer Discount Co. v. Vukman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 2013PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

This is an appeal from the order of the Superior Court affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, which granted appellee’s motion to set aside judgment and sheriffs sale, and dismissed appellant Beneficial Consumer Discount Company’s praecipe without prejudice. Upon review, we reverse and remand.

In October, 2006, mortgagee Beneficial filed a complaint in mortgage foreclosure against mortgagor appellee, alleging appellee was in default. Prior to the filing, Beneficial provided appellee an “Act 91” notice, discussed below. The parties eventually…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. US Bank National Ass'n v. GuillaumeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Shenango Valley Osteopathic Hospital v. Department of Health of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Skelton v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. S.K.C. v. J.L.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. SpivakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Bank of New York Mellon v. Bach, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Frempong, S. v. Richardson, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. In re RuizUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API