Tommaseo v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
BRADEN, Judge.
On November 30, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Motion To File A Second Amended (Class Action) Complaint1 (“Pl.Mot.Leave”), together with a Proposed Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“Second Amend. Compl.”). On December 17, 2007, the Government filed an Opposition (“Gov’t Resp.”), and on December 31, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Reply (“Pl.Reply”).
I. RELEVANT FACTS.2
The Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (“MRGO”) is a 76-mile, man-made navigation channel, designed and maintained by the United…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- St. Bernard Parish v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.