Legal Opinion

Tommaseo v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 31, 2008No. 05-1119LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.

BRADEN, Judge.

On November 30, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Motion To File A Second Amended (Class Action) Complaint1 (“Pl.Mot.Leave”), together with a Proposed Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“Second Amend. Compl.”). On December 17, 2007, the Government filed an Opposition (“Gov’t Resp.”), and on December 31, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a Reply (“Pl.Reply”).

I. RELEVANT FACTS.2

The Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (“MRGO”) is a 76-mile, man-made navigation channel, designed and maintained by the United…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. St. Bernard Parish v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  5. St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API