Legal Opinion
Burns International Security Services Corp. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 19, 2004No. B168209PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
Appellant Bums International Security Services Corporation (Bums) seeks to prevent respondent County of Los Angeles (the County) from enforcing Los Angeles County Code chapter 2.203 (Chapter 2.203), which essentially precludes the County from contracting with companies that do not pay their employees for at least five days of jury duty. Bums contends (1) that Chapter 2.203 violates article 11, section 7 of the California Constitution (article 11, section 7), which prohibits local entities from enforcing regulations extraterritorially, and (2) that Chapter 2.203 is preempted by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reeves, Inc. v. StakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Associated General Contractors of America, San Diego Chapter, Inc. v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cnty. of Ventura v. City of Moorpark, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cal. Resources Production Corp. v. Antioch City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- County of Ventura v. City of MoorparkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018