Legal Opinion

County of Ventura v. City of Moorpark

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 2018No. B282466Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 6/12/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX COUNTY OF VENTURA et al., 2d Civil No. B282466 (Super. Ct. No. Plaintiffs and Appellants, VENCI00479937) (Santa Barbara County) v. CITY OF MOORPARK, Defendant and Appellant; BROAD BEACH GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. The purpose of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is to ensure “[t]he maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future.” (Pub. Resources Code,1 § 21000, subd. (a).) But…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Avco Community Developers, Inc. v. South Coast Regional CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API