Legal Opinion

Long v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1985No. B011876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

Plaintiff sought in an action on a promissory note to recover a purchase money deficiency following defendant’s default in the purchase of real property. By petition for writ of mandate, plaintiff seeks to vacate an order that denied his application for prejúdgment attachment, on the ground that Code of Civil Procedure section 580b bars recovery of the purchase money deficiency. Plaintiff’s subordinated purchase-money second deed of trust was rendered valueless when defendant purchaser defaulted and the subordinating construction loan trust deed was foreclosed upon.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Budget Realty, Inc. v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roffinella v. SherinianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Ziegler v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Boyle v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Cosentino v. Coastal Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Sleep E-Z, LLC v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API