Legal Opinion
State on Information of Goodman v. Smith
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided September 28, 1932PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is a quo warranto proceeding instituted at the information of William F. Goodman, Prosecuting Attorney of Pike County, at the relation of J.W. Crewdson, mayor of the city of Louisiana, Missouri, and others to challenge the validity of the incorporation of the village of Elmwood.
The judgment of the trial court was that the incorporation of the village was valid, and the proceedings in quo warranto were dismissed. From this judgment appellants and relators have appealed.
The territory in question lies just outside the corporate limits of the city of Louisiana, Missouri. The information…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Smith v. McIverSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Taylor v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Peale v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. City of North Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- City of Joplin v. Village of Shoal Creek DriveMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Binz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- In Re Township 143 North, Range 55 West, in Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- MAYOR, COUNCILMEN, ETC. v. Dealers Transport Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.