Legal Opinion

People v. Schultz

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1987No. D004061PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Defendant Mark James Schultz appeals after a jury found him guilty of two counts of forcible oral copulation in concert (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (d))2 based on events occurring in the San Diego County jail facility in Vista. As to one of the two counts, the Attorney General concedes that a technical error in the taking of the verdict requires reversal and *537precludes retrial on that count. As to the remaining count, we conclude that a conceded error by the trial judge in refusing to admit defense-proffered evidence cannot reasonably be said to have affected the result and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. DelettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API