People v. Schultz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
Defendant Mark James Schultz appeals after a jury found him guilty of two counts of forcible oral copulation in concert (Pen. Code, § 288a, subd. (d))2 based on events occurring in the San Diego County jail facility in Vista. As to one of the two counts, the Attorney General concedes that a technical error in the taking of the verdict requires reversal and *537precludes retrial on that count. As to the remaining count, we conclude that a conceded error by the trial judge in refusing to admit defense-proffered evidence cannot reasonably be said to have affected the result and that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. DelettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987