Legal Opinion
American Dredging Company v. Calmar Steamship Corporation, Cross-Libellant
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 31, 1955No. 11445_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In this maritime collision case, the district court in a carefully considered decision found the appellant solely to blame. Our own examination of the record satisfies us that this finding is supported by substantial evidence. The decree of the district court, 121 F.Supp. 255, will be affirmed. McAllister v. United States, 348 U.S. 19, 75 S.Ct. 6.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- American Dredging Co. v. Calmar S. S. Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corporation v. Hess Tankship Company of Delaware, Amerada Hess Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross American Hull Syndicate, Defendants-Third Party v. Allied Towing Corporation as Owner of the Tug Socrates, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Defelice Towing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge And Tunnel District v. J. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Jones Towing, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.