Legal Opinion
American Dredging Co. v. Calmar S. S. Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 18, 1954No. 47 of 1952PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, District Judge.
This action arose out of a collision between the Liberty-type steamship Cal-mar and an anchored mud scow at 11:43% P.M. on the night of November :30, 1951, which occurred on the Horseshoe Bend of the Delaware River, approximately opposite the north end of .Mustin Field, a part of the Philadelphia Naval Base. From the pleadings and proof I make the following -
Findings of Fact
1. Libellant, American Dredging Company, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, its principal office and place of business being located at 12 S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Carr v. Hermosa Amusement Corporation, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- The Buenos AiresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- The OliverDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1885
- Eastern Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Allied Chemical Corporation v. Hess Tankship Company of Delaware, Amerada Hess Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross American Hull Syndicate, Defendants-Third Party v. Allied Towing Corporation as Owner of the Tug Socrates, Third Party Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Defelice Towing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Reading Company v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel District v. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Chesapeake Bay Bridge And Tunnel District v. J. LauritzenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.