Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Bay Bridge And Tunnel District v. J. Lauritzen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1968No. 11886_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

404 F.2d 1001

CHESAPEAKE BAY BRIDGE AND TUNNEL DISTRICT, Respondent, Appellant,

v.

J. LAURITZEN, owner M/S BELLA DAN, Libellant; Tidewater Construction Corporation, Raymond International, Inc. and Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, a joint venture, trading as Tidewater-Raymond-Kiewit, and Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation, Respondents, Appellees.

No. 11886.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1968.

Decided May 2, 1968.

R. M. Hughes, III, and Peter W. Martone, Norfolk, Va., (Seawell, McCoy, Winston & Dalton, Norfolk, Va., on brief) for appellant.

Hugh S. Meredith, Norfolk, Va.,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Elizabeth River Tunnel District v. BeecherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  5. Anthony v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Bunge Corp. v. M/V Furness BridgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Janet Karpovs, Individually and as Personal Representative of Juris A. Karpovs, Deceased v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Hess Tankship Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API