Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Libby

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 29, 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On report. Judgment for plaintiffs for $500, with interest from the date of the writ. This is an action of assumpsit on an account annexed to the writ, and a special count to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, being an assessment of one hundred per cent by the plaintiffs, upon five shares of the capital stock of the Waterville Trust Company, of the par value of one hundred dollars each, and owned by defendant’s intestate. The plea, general issue.

Read the full summary

On report. Judgment for plaintiffs for $500, with interest from the date of the writ. This is an action of assumpsit on an account annexed to the writ, and a special count to recover the sum of five hundred dollars, being an assessment of one hundred per cent by the plaintiffs, upon five shares of the capital stock of the Waterville Trust Company, of the par value of one hundred dollars each, and owned by defendant’s intestate. The plea, general issue. The case was reported to the Law Court upon an agreed statement. Upon so much of the evidence as is legally admissible, the court will render…

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

This case is reported to the Law Court on an agreed statement of facts.

July i, 1909, the Waterville Trust Company of Waterville, Maine, by decree of the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, was enjoined from further prosecuting business, and the plaintiffs were then appointed its receivers and duly qualified.

At that time Bertha L. Libby of Pittsfield, Maine, was the owner of record of five shares of the capital stock of said Trust Company of the par value of $100 each. April 3, 1910, she died, intestate, leaving a surviving husband, and the defendant, Helen M. Libby, as her sole heir. Her estate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Douglass v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe-Deposit Co. v. Mechanics' Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Springfield v. ClementMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Gorham v. ChadwickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  3. Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  4. Pink v. Town Taxi Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1941
  5. Woodbine Savings Bank v. ShriverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API