Legal Opinion

Woodbine Savings Bank v. Shriver

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1929No. 39479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

On May 6, 1891, the.plaintiff-appellee was incorporated as a savings bank under the laws of Iowa.. Thereafter, at the expiration of the charter thus granted, the appellee was re-incorporated May 11, 1911. The capital stock of the appellee bank was increased in February, 1920, from $30,000 to $50,000. At that time the defendant-appellant owned 26 shares of this stock.

Appellant’s stock was obtained upon three different occasions as follows: 10 shares on May 18, 1891; 10 shares on April 16, 1906; and 6 1/6 shares on February 14, 1917. For some reason there was later a reissuance of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Barnitz v. BeverlySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Whitman v. Oxford National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. County of San Mateo v. Southern Pacific R.United States Circuit Court · 1882

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shriver v. Woodbine Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hudson v. Bank of WaldoSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. McCaskell v. Purity Fibre Products Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1934
  4. Robert F. Gannon v. Maureen G. Ryan, Michael C. Ryan, and Ryan Data Exchange, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API