Legal Opinion

Acevedo v. Forcinito

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 12, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-0172PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RODRIGUEZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ -motion for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the motion in part and grants the motion in part.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Jorge Acevedo, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants violated his civil rights during his twenty months of incarceration at the Cumberland County Jail. Acevedo, who is not conversant in English, claims that defendants denied him meaningful access to the courts by failing both to maintain an adequate law library and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turiano v. SchnarrsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API