Legal Opinion

City of Marion v. Sneeden

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 5, 1934No. 400PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

delivered the opinion of the Court..

The Act of June 25, 1930, e. 604, 46 Stat. 809, amends § 45 of the National Bank Act of 1864 1 by adding thereto the following:

“Any association may, upon the deposit with it of public money, of a State or any political subdivision thereof, give security for the safe-keeping and prompt payment of the money so deposited, of the same kind as is authorized by the law of the State in which such association is located in the case of other banking institutions in the State."

The controlling question is whether Illinois has con- - ferred upon banks organized under ,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ward v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co. v. ConklingIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Cameron v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. First American Bank & Trust Co. v. Town of Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. TremaineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API