Pringle v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by William N. Pringle and another against George J. Miller for deceit. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant, being the owner of a certain messuage, sold the same upon contract to a Mrs. Stork. The plaintiffs, being desirous of purchasing the same, negotiated with the husband of Mrs. Stork, and finally purchased the property. They subsequently brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for alleged deceit in certain representations alleged to have been made by the defendant prior to their purchase, when interrogated in relation to the condition of the premises, at a time when and under circumstances showing that he knew of their contemplated purchase.
*664Mr. Stork was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hitchcock v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Carne v. LitchfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
- Buckley v. LowryMichigan Supreme Court · 1852
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
- Rutter v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. HeardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HammondMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. Herbert BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973