Rutter v. Collins
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Clinton. (Daboll, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Plaintiff sues for breach of promise of marriage. Defendant admits the proposal on January 1, 1886, but denies its acceptance. Plaintiff testified that the acceptance was express and immediate. Defendant insisted that plaintiff avoided the question, and gave no answer. The court instructed the jury as follows:
“No particular form of words is- necessary to establish that contract. If you findJ that he made an offer, then ,tlie acceptance, and, for -that matter, the offer, may be proved simply by actions and conduct as well as by express words; and in passing upon that question you have a right…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Evans v. Town of TrentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mott v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Nolan v. GlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Johnson v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Rutter v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Duff v. JudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.