Legal Opinion

Board of Education of East Haven V. East Haven Education Ass'n

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 16, 2001No. AC 20859PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Our Supreme Court has recently reviewed the principles governing arbitration, including the purpose of the arbitration process, the role of the arbitrator and the scope of judicial review of arbitral awards. See South Windsor v. South Windsor Police Union Local *2041480, Council 15, 255 Conn. 800, 770 A.2d 14 (2001). In this case of first impression, we must determine how best to apply those principles to resolve an issue concerning the scope of a trial court’s remedial authority after an arbitral award has been vacated. General Statutes § 52-418 (b).1 It is undisputed that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wachter v. UDV North America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Barlow v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Norwalk Police Union, Local 1727, Council 15, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Rocky Hill Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API