Legal Opinion

Palmer v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2012No. Nos. 20110344, 20110346, 20110347, 20110348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Palmer appeals from a district court order denying his N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Palmer’s motion.

I

[¶ 2] In 2001, Palmer was convicted of four counts of gross sexual imposition. Palmer appealed, and this Court affirmed his convictions. State v. Palmer, 2002 ND 5, 638 N.W.2d 18. In February 2011, Palmer applied for post-conviction relief, and an attorney was appointed to represent him. On March 1, 2011, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Follman v. Upper Valley Special Education UnitNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. American Bank Center v. SchuhNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riak v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Matter of RichardsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Palmer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Riak v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Riak v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API