Crotteau v. Karlgaard
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The sole issue is whether the trial court should have directed a verdict on the issue of liability.
The rule as to directing verdicts has recently been stated in Zillmer v. Miglautsch (1967), 35 Wis. 2d 691, 698, 699, 151 N. W. 2d 741, as follows:
“A case should be taken from the jury and a verdict directed against a party:
“ ‘ “. . . only when the evidence gives rise to no dispute as to the material issues or only when the evidence is so clear and convincing as reasonably to permit unbiased and impartial minds to come to but one conclusion.” ’ Anderson v. Joint School Dist. (1964), 24 Wis. (2d)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Rusch v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Milwaukee v. BichelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Anderson v. Joint School District No. 3Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Berg v. FallCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Voith v. BuserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Maichle v. JonovicWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Smith v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.