Commonwealth v. O'Neil
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLaurence, J.
Deborah O’Neil and her son, Steven O’Neil, were indicted and convicted as joint venturers in the arson of a *171Lawrence residence. The arson was actually committed by another son, Michael O’Neil, and his best friend, Charles Rosinski. Steven O’Neil here challenges the denial of his pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment against him, asserting that the grand jury heard insufficient evidence to establish probable cause to arrest him for the crime charged. Deborah O’Neil contends primarily that her counsel was ineffective in cross-examining Rosinski, the Commonwealth’s only percipient witness…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lingis v. WaisbrenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. RebelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GoitiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.