Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. O'Neil

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 10, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A single justice of this court denied a petition filed by the Commonwealth pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. The Commonwealth appeals. We affirm.

The Commonwealth, aggrieved by the Appeals Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. O’Neil, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 170 (2001), filed an application for *1008further appellate review,1 a motion in the Appeals Court seeking leave to file a late petition for rehearing, and a petition in the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. The Commonwealth maintains that the Appeals Court erred in ordering a new trial on the record before it, and instead should have remanded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foxworth v. St. AmandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. GoitiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Foxworth v. St. AmandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Foxworth v. ST. AMANDCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Asadoorian v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API