Commonwealth v. O'Neil
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
A single justice of this court denied a petition filed by the Commonwealth pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. The Commonwealth appeals. We affirm.
The Commonwealth, aggrieved by the Appeals Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. O’Neil, 51 Mass. App. Ct. 170 (2001), filed an application for *1008further appellate review,1 a motion in the Appeals Court seeking leave to file a late petition for rehearing, and a petition in the county court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3. The Commonwealth maintains that the Appeals Court erred in ordering a new trial on the record before it, and instead should have remanded…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McGuinness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Foxworth v. St. AmandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Commonwealth v. GoitiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Foxworth v. St. AmandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Foxworth v. ST. AMANDCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Asadoorian v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003