Legal Opinion

State v. Magana

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 2014No. CR0901676; A145917; CR0901677; A145963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

This case, now before us on remand from the Supreme Court, began as a consolidated appeal by defendants Ramirez Rivera (defendant), who was convicted of one count of unlawful delivery of heroin, ORS 475.850, and Magana, who was convicted of one count of unlawful manufacture of heroin, ORS 487.846. The trial court had denied their respective motions to suppress, and they challenged the rulings on appeal. We reversed and remanded with respect to both Magana and defendant. We agreed with Magana’s contention that, when the police had encountered him at the apartment he shared with defendant, he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. HighleyOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API