Hupp v. Metromail Corp. Special Severance Plan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas M. Hupp (“Hupp”) sues Defendant Metromail Corporation Special Severance Plan (the “Plan”) pursuant' to § 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). Specifically, Hupp seeks severance benefits that he claims are due him under the Plan but were denied him by the administrators of the Plan. On July 27, 2000, this Court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss. Hupp v. Experian Corp., 108 F.Supp.2d 1008 (N.D.Ill.2000). The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jacobs v. Xerox Corporation Long Term Disability Income PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- New v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008