Dane County v. Barron County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberey, C. J.
We shall state only such facts as are necessary to a disposition of the principal questions raised in this case. First, we shall consider the contention of the defendant that the department had no jurisdiction to try and determine the question of the liability of the town of Rice Lake for the reason that sec. 49.03 (8a), Stats., was void because of an unconstitutional delegation of judicial power to the board. Counsel requests the court to re-examine Holland v. Cedar Grove (1939), 230 Wis. 177, 282 N. W. 111, 282 N. W. 448, and overrule it.
Holland v. Cedar Grove was decided February 7, 1939.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Town of Holland v. Village of Cedar GroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Town of Scott v. Town of ClaytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Peabody v. Town of HollandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
- Town of Rhine v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Outagamie County v. Town of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Aiken v. MalloySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974