Legal Opinion
Devito v. Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, LLC
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 7, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-3773 (SDW)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WIGENTON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Zucker, Goldberg & Ackerman, LLC’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (“Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Claudia Devito’s (“Plaintiff’) Cross Motion for partial Summary Judgment (“Cross Motion”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1381. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). This Court, having considered the parties’ submissions, decides the Motions without oral argument pursuant to Federal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- DEANGELO v. LVNV FUNDING LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- DOE v. BRENNANDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP. v. WEEKESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- FIORARANCIO v. ZWICKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- GARCIA v. COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.