Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Rose

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1975No. 13Published

1DissentPomeroy, Justice

In my view, the decision of the majority of the Court in this case not only is erroneous but also will lead to unnecessary complications in the administration of decedents’ estates in Pennsylvania. Therefore, for the reasons which follow, I must respectfully dissent.

I. VALUATION OF INCOME IN RESPECT OF A DECEDENT

The initial problem presented by this case is one of valuation for Pennsylvania inheritance tax purposes of certain assets in a decedent’s estate. The value of an item of property subject to such taxation is fair market *72value as statutorily defined in the classic mold.1 Value as thus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Frick Et Al. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Kirkpatrick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Bayer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Matter of Estate of RosenblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API