Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The accused moved that the complaint be separated in two counts, one for the support of the child and one for the support of the wife; so far as the record before us shows, the trial court never passed on the motion, and although assigned among the errors it is not properly before us.

A challenge to the array of jurors was made by the accused because the jurors required to complete the jury panel were not drawn in accordance with General Statutes, § 5688, in that five jurors residing in Litchfield County were drawn in the absence both of a sheriff and of a deputy sheriff of Litchfield County,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. State v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  3. Alley v. WinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Cook v. FogartySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  2. State v. FrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  4. State v. CobbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Edison Realty Co. v. BauernschubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API