Legal Opinion

Ewert v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1984No. C6-84-898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Gene Anderson and his parents, Mabel Grace Anderson and Ray Anderson, appeal from a judgment dated February 16, 1984. They appeal from that judgment despite the entry of a corrected judgment on March 5, 1984. Proof of service of the motion for that order has been filed. We treat this as an appeal from the corrected judgment.

Appellants raise as issues the trial court’s award of a judgment greatly in excess of the ad damnum clause of the complaint, the deprivation of possession of agricultural land during the redemption period after foreclosure, the conclusion of law that a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. Young Ex Rel. Young v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Gardner v. W. M. Prindle & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Ahrenholz v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harbal v. Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Lang v. BakerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Carnel v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API