Legal Opinion
Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global Naps, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 19, 2007No. Civil Action 3:04-cv-2075 (JCH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION (Doc. No. 504)
JANET C. HALL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The defendants, NAPs, Inc., Global NAPs New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPs Networks, Inc., Global NAPs Realty, Inc., and Ferrous Miner Holding, Ltd. (collectively “Global”) bring this Motion to Dismiss the non-stayed claims asserted by plaintiff Southern New England Telephone Co. (“SNET”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Def.’s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. to Dis. (“Def.’s Mem.”) at 1 (Doc. No. 504). Global’s Motion is based on a theory that SNET’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Johnny Richardson v. Glenn S. Goord, C. Coyne, Dr. Mathew, Auburn Correctional Facility, Dick Hunter, Auburn Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Central Telephone Co. v. Sprint Communications Co. of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Ohio Bell Tel. Co., Inc. v. Global Naps Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008