Legal Opinion
Ohio Bell Tel. Co., Inc. v. Global Naps Ohio, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 31, 2008No. 06-CV-549PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, Inc. (“Ohio Bell”), filed a nine-count amended complaint against Defendants Global NAPs Ohio, Inc., Global NAPs, Inc., Global NAPs New Hampshire, Inc., Global NAPs Networks, Inc., Global NAPs Realty, Inc., and Ferrous Miner Holding, Ltd. (collectively, “Global”). Ohio Bell alleges that since at least February 2004, it has provided Global with certain telecommunications services and facilities, but that Global has refused to pay. The amended complaint therefore alleges violations of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sanchez-Knutson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
- Central Telephone Co. v. Sprint Communications Co. of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011