Steensland v. Hoppmann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The petitioners asked the circuit court to permit them to inspect the minutes of the grand jury, each assigning as his reason therefor that “such inspection and right to make copies are necessary in order that the defendant may properly prepare for and make his defense herein, and in order that the defendant may be properly advised as to what pleas and motions to enter herein to properly protect all his rights in this action.” The indictment sets forth eight counts, in substance charging both defendants on a certain date, being then officers of the Union Trust Company of Madison, a banking…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. . GlenNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- In re MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Havenor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Cornell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- United States v. ViolonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Waste Management of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Jackson v. CoffeyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Meriwether v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.