Legal Opinion

Tilden v. ANSTREICHER, MD

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 7, 1976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice:

In this medical malpractice action, plaintiff appeals from the granting of all defendants’ motions for summary judgment by the Superior Court on the ground that plaintiff’s suit was not timely filed. The plaintiff contends that the cause of action is not barred by the Statute of Limitations because: (1) the defendants are estopped to assert the defense of the Statute of Limitations; (2) the Statute of Limitations is tolled because the cause of action was fraudulently concealed; (3) the applicable Statute of Limitations is that for trespass (10 Del.C. § 8106), 1 with its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  2. Lewis v. Pawnee Bill's Wild West Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1907
  3. Roy v. HartogsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lecates v. Hertrich Pontiac Buick Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  2. Shockley v. DyerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Sellon v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  4. Nationwide Ins. Co. v. RothermelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Hiznay v. StrangeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API