Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Caldwell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1871No. 2,341PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal, from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, County of Solano. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, C. J.:

The plaintiff sues in ejectment, and relies for a recovery on his legal title. The defendant Forrest, the vendee of Caldwell, sets up in his cross complaint a contract made between the plaintiff and Caldwell, by which the plaintiff sold to Caldwell the premises in controversy, and covenanted to convey the same to him upon the payment of the purchase money therein mentioned; and alleges that he entered into possession of the land under the contract; that the plaintiff falsely and fraudulently represented that he owned the whole land; but that in truth he owned only…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Miller v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Burks v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Garvey v. LashellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API