Legal Opinion

Simmerer v. Dabbas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2000No. 99-1570PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The question raised by this case is whether damages associated with parenting a child born with a birth defect are recoverable in a wrongful pregnancy action stemming from a negligently performed sterilization procedure, when the doctor who performed the unsuccessful sterilization procedure could not have reasonably foreseen the birth defect. We hold that they are not.

I. Classification of This Action

To put this case in context, we first categorize the typical birth-based medical malpractice actions. In a wrongful pregnancy action, one or both parents of a child born following a negligently…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Pitre v. Opelousas General Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Scott & Fetzer Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Anderson v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bowman v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schirmer v. Mt. Auburn Obstetrics & Gynecologic Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Yoder v. Artex Oil Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. K & D Farms, Ltd v. Enervest Operating, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. White v. KingOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Simmerer v. DabbasOhio Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API