Schirmer v. Mt. Auburn Obstetrics & Gynecologic Associates, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} We are asked to consider whether the parents of an unhealthy child born following negligent genetic counseling or a negligent failure to diagnose a fetal defect or disease may bring suit for the costs of having to raise and care for an impaired child. We hold that such a suit may be brought under traditional medical-malpractice principles and that the costs recoverable are those arising from the pregnancy and birth of the child. No consequential economic or consequential noneconomic damages may be recovered for the care and rearing of the child.
I. Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2}…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Anderson v. St. Francis-St. George Hospital, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Loudin v. Radiology & Imaging Servs., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Wilson v. Columbus Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Tillman v. GoodpastureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- O'Stricker v. Robinson Mem'l Hosp. Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Clough v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.