Legal Opinion
United States v. Burson Augustin
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 1, 2011No. 09-15985PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Per curiam
Burson Augustin, Stanley Grant Phanor, Patrick Abraham, Rotschild Augustine, and Narseal Batiste (collectively, “Appellants”) were all convicted of (1) conspiracy to provide material support to a Foreign Terrorist Organization (A1 Qaeda) by agreeing to provide personnel (including themselves) to work under A1 Qaeda’s direction and control, knowing that A1 Qaeda has engaged or engages in terrorist activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2339B; and (2) conspiracy to provide material support by agreeing to provide personnel (including themselves), knowing and intending that they were to be used in…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. Ronn Darnell SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Knight Ex Rel. Kerr v. Miami-Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Dane GillisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Cecil Anthony DortchCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.