Legal Opinion

People v. Swinton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 2006PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reducing defendants’ convictions for assault in the first degree to assault in the third degree and remitting to Supreme Court for resentencing and, as so modified, affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, the evidence is legally insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendants acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference (People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288 [2006]). The evidence is legally sufficient, however, to support the jury’s determination…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. FeingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Policano v. HerbertNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. People v. DickersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. BollingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API