Legal Opinion

Caradonna v. Thorious

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1969No. Docket 4,152PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1964, a tornado caused extensive damage to plaintiffs’ home. Defendant Thorious was recommended to plaintiffs as one qualified to undertake the necessary reconstruction and repairs. Thorious contracted to repair the home according to plans and specifications agreed upon. The price was $7,500 with payments to he made as the work progressed.

After defendant completed the repair, plaintiffs returned to their home. A total of $7,000 had been paid by plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs were dissatisfied with the work and defendants’ refusal to correct alleged defects. Thereafter, they instituted this action…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gundersen v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Jankowski v. MazzottaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Gutov v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Morrow v. L. A. Goldschmidt Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
  5. Olga's Kitchen of Hayward, Inc. v. PapoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API