Dickson v. Rose
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Allen Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, C. J.
Counsel for the appellee insists that the errors assigned are not available.
The exception to the conclusions of law stated by the court upon the facts specially found was not taken when the conclusions were announced and entered upon the court’s docket. The next step taken by the appellants, after the entry of the-finding and conclusions of law, was to file a motion for a new trial; and having excepted to the overruling of this motion, they then, in open court, excepted to the conclusions of law.
The code provides explicitly that an exception must be taken “at the time the decision is made; ”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor of the World v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Robinson v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Coan v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Alcorn v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Barner v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Helms v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Radabaugh v. SilversIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.