Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Dahl

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 12, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Fourth Division);,

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The appellee, Dahl, brought this suit against the ap-. pellant, “¡3. Bosenberg and others, partners doing busi-, ness under the firm name and style of Boyal Milling Com-; pany, and'George Bomiser,” to recover damages for personal-injuries sustained,, as he alleged, when a vehicle in which he was riding in the city of Louisville was collided with by a runaway horse and buggy ^ owned, as he alleged', by “S. Bosenberg. and others unknown to this plaintiff, doing, business under the firm name and style of Boyal Milling Company,” and which at the time…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baumeister v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  2. Dolfinger & Co. v. FishbackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  3. Southworth v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Corona Coal & Iron Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Hedger v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Monohan v. Grayson County Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Commercial Carriers, Inc. v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Louisville Cement Co. v. Clell Coleman & SonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. Borderland Coal Co. v. BurchettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Hale v. HaleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API